RepRisk case study
Volkswagen
# Volkswagen’s emissions cheating device scandal
# May 2018
What happened?
On September 18, 2015, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accused Volkswagen (VW) of using “defeat device” software that made their diesel-powered vehicles appear to have lower emission levels than they actually did. US regulators accused the company of violating the Clean Air Act and ordered VW to recall more than 480,000 VW and Audi vehicles.
In the days that followed, VW’s stock value fell by 23 percent, and on September 23, 2015, Volkswagen’s CEO Martin Winterkorn resigned.
The scandal then spread to other VW brands across the world, including Audi, SEAT, and Skoda, when the governments of Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, and nine other countries announced plans to investigate the emission levels of vehicles manufactured by the VW Group. An estimated 11 million cars worldwide were implicated in the scandal.
In the US, eight current and former VW executives were indicted by the Department of Justice. One executive was sentenced to seven years in prison in December 2017. In January 2017, VW agreed to pay USD 4.3 billion to settle with the DOJ over the scandal. The company has also agreed to pay a total settlement of USD 25 billion for claims from customers, dealers, and environmental regulators.
In South Korea, the Ministry of Environment fined Audi Volkswagen Korea KRW 17.8 billion (USD 16.6 billion) and launched criminal proceedings against seven VW managers and four employees, including the Managing Director of Audi Volkswagen Korea, who fled to Germany in June 2017, and two of his predecessors. In January 2017, an executive of Volkswagen Korea was sentenced to one year and six months in prison.
In July 2017, EU and German anti-trust regulators began investigating a possible collusion between Volkswagen and other automobile manufacturers to use an inexpensive “dosage” strategy for a liquid solution that neutralizes the exhaust emissions of diesel vehicles.
In March 2018, Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes were criticized for financing experiments on primates and students in Germany and the United States in 2014 to test their reaction to diesel fumes. The aim was to present diesel as an inoffensive substance. The primates were reportedly locked in cages and forced to inhale exhaust fumes for six hours a day. Similar tests were reportedly conducted on 25 people at the laboratory of an Aachen University Clinic in Germany. The results were never made public because the tests reportedly proved that diesel fumes are extremely toxic.
Was it foreseeable?
For 2014, the Volkswagen announced record sales of EUR 202.5 billion (USD 228.4 billion), and in March 2015, Moody’s rated Volkswagen as “A2: stable” and forecast “improvement in Volkswagen’s operational performance in the next 12 to 18 months.”
However, as early as May 2013, and again in June 2013, RepRisk had identified reports of inconsistencies between CO2 emissions statistics released by VW and other car manufacturers, and the actual levels of CO2 emitted by the companies’ vehicles. Different reports by two non-profit organizations, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) and Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH), accused the companies of employing technical tricks to tamper with the emissions data in order to reduce vehicle and road taxes.
In September 2014, the ICCT Europe cited Volkswagen as one of the manufacturers of vehicles whose emissions during laboratory testing did not match those registered under everyday driving conditions. On September 17, 2015, the day before the scandal broke, the German NGO Deutsche Umwelthilfe again accused Volkswagen of promoting its diesel vehicles as being clean while deliberately exceeding legal limits by up to 25 times.
In fact, RepRisk is the only ESG research provider that flagged the high risk exposure related to VW before the scandal broke: VW was considered “high risk” by RepRisk as early as September 2014, when the company reached a RepRisk Index (RRI) of 72 – well above the high-risk threshold of 50.1 This was due, in large part, to systematic risk incidents related to anti-competitive practices, misleading advertising, corruption, and fraud.
RepRisk is the only ESG research provider that flagged the high risk exposure related to VW before the scandal broke: VW was considered “high risk” by RepRisk as early as September 2014, when the company reached a RepRisk Index (RRI) of 66.
Consequences for Volkswagen
At the beginning of 2018, Volkswagen appeared to be on the road to recovery, after completely overhauling the management team. Operational results have also been improving, with deliveries to customers increasing by 4.2 percent during the first semester of 2017 compared to the previous year.
However, as of March 2018, the company continues to face hundreds of thousands of lawsuits from owners of diesel cars and investors around the world, and and is facing costs of around USD 30 billion to settle both criminal and civil lawsuits, as well as to buy back and modify vehicles affected by its diesel emissions fraud.
In April 2018, the Korean newspapers reported that Audi Volkswagen Korea and Porsche Korea face possible fines of KRW 14.1 billion (USD 13.16 billion) in fines for participating in the emissions fraud.
Volkswagen faces around 1,600 investor lawsuits in Germany that are collectively claiming EUR 8.6 billion (USD 10.19 billion) for the emissions cheating, as well as probes in the Netherlands and Austria.
Company Description
Volkswagen AG manufactures cars, trucks, and commercial vehicles for sale worldwide. The company also owns Audi, SEAT, and Skoda, which manufacture and sell cars in southern and eastern Europe, and Lamborghini, which makes sports cars in Italy.
Figure 1: VW’s share price plummeted but sales did not (graph adapted). Now, VW is said to be the No.1 carmaker globally despite the diesel cheating scandal. Source: Bloomberg.
What RepRisk’s data showed before the scandal
June 2013 A report by the NGO International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) claimed that carbon emissions declared by carmakers were on average 25 percent higher than the figures communicated. Reportedly, emissions for Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault, Toyota, and Volkswagen were higher than the data published by the carmakers.
September 2014 In a report entitled From Laboratory to Road, also by the ICCT, it was alleged that car manufacturers in Europe, including Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz, had falsified their fuel consumption statements by up to 50 percent in 2013.
September 2015 The German NGO Deutsche Umwelthilfe accused BMW, Daimler, and Volkswagen of being responsible for tens of thousands of premature deaths caused by air pollution from toxic diesel fumes in Germany. In particular, it criticized the companies for promoting their new diesel vehicles as being clean, while installing substandard catalytic converters and deliberately exceeding legal emission limits by up to 25 times.
Copyright 2020 RepRisk AG. All rights reserved. RepRisk AG owns all intellectual property rights to this case study. This information herein is given in summary form and does not purport to be complete. Any reference to or distribution of this case study must include the entire case study to provide sufficient context. The information provided in this presentation does not constitute an offer or quote for our services or a recommendation regarding any investment or other business decision. Should you wish to obtain a quote for our services, please contact us.